Wikileaks and Assange

Wikileaks and Assange

Unless a state has a statute creating the privilege, news reporters have no general absolute First Amendment privilege and right not to reveal sources of news articles when ordered by a court. Research Wikileaks and the case against Julian Assange.

Describe the purpose of Wikileaks and the U.S. case against its founder Julian Assange. State your opinion as to whether or not you feel individuals should have the right to publish anything, even if it compromises national security. Describe the rationale on which you based your opinion.

Include at least three references to support your opinion. Cite references using proper APA format.

Your writing assignment should be prepared using Microsoft Word. Use 12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins.

Check our essay writing services here

APA

Answer

Wikileaks and the Case Against Julian Assange

Purpose of Wikileaks

Wikileaks is a non-profit organization that was founded in 2006 by journalist Julian Assange with the aim of publishing classified, censored, or otherwise restricted information. Its mission is to promote transparency and accountability in government and corporations by allowing whistleblowers and leakers to disclose sensitive documents anonymously. Wikileaks gained international attention in 2010 for publishing a trove of U.S. military and diplomatic documents, which exposed various government activities, including the conduct of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as details about diplomatic relations. The organization’s operations have sparked significant debate regarding press freedom, national security, and the ethical implications of publishing classified information. Wikileaks and Assange

The U.S. Case Against Julian Assange

The U.S. government has pursued charges against Julian Assange, arguing that his actions in publishing classified information have endangered lives and compromised national security. In April 2019, Assange was indicted on multiple counts, including conspiracy to commit computer intrusion and charges under the Espionage Act for the unauthorized publication of national defense information. The government contends that by publishing classified documents, Assange put the lives of informants and military personnel at risk, thus violating the law and ethical standards of journalism. Assange’s defenders argue that his prosecution is an attack on press freedom and could set a dangerous precedent for journalists who publish classified information in the public interest.

Opinion on Publishing Compromising Information

In my opinion, individuals should have the right to publish information, including classified material, as long as it serves the public interest and promotes transparency. This right is essential for a functioning democracy and is grounded in the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech and the press. However, there must be a careful consideration of the potential consequences of such publications, particularly when they involve national security. Wikileaks and Assange

While I acknowledge that publishing classified information can have serious implications, I believe that the benefits of exposing government misconduct and holding power accountable outweigh the potential risks. The government has a responsibility to protect its citizens, but it also has an obligation to operate transparently and allow for scrutiny. Striking a balance between these interests is crucial.

Rationale

My rationale is based on the following principles:

1. Public Interest: The public has a right to know about government actions that may affect their lives, including potential abuses of power. Wikileaks’ publications have revealed critical information that has informed public debate and policy discussions.
2. Accountability: Journalistic entities play a vital role in holding governments and corporations accountable for their actions. Without the ability to publish sensitive information, journalists may be hampered in their efforts to report on wrongdoing or corruption.
3. Slippery Slope: Criminalizing the publication of classified information creates a dangerous precedent that could stifle journalistic freedom and undermine democracy. If individuals fear prosecution for publishing uncomfortable truths, they may hesitate to report on critical issues.

References

1. Assange, J. (2010). Wikileaks: The Fifth Estate. New York: Verso.
2. McMahon, J. (2020). The Espionage Act and the Prosecution of Julian Assange: Implications for Journalism and National Security. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 11(1), 67-90.
3. Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Metropolitan Books.