WhatsApp Number: +1(249) 265-0080
Legal Loopholes Impact
Type a set of five questions and answers that reflect your understanding of the concepts of facts, win-win transactions, loopholes, and line drawing.
Your test will be graded on your ability to create thought-provoking, practical examples and demonstrate deep engagement with the material. Be sure to follow these guidelines carefully.
Check our essay writing services here
Legal Loopholes Impact
What to Do:
- Create Five Original Questions (20 Points Each):
- Write one question for each of the following concepts:
- Facts: Focus on how legal decision-makers determine “what happened” in a case.
- Win-Win Transactions: Explore situations where all parties seemingly benefit and the legal or ethical boundaries of such agreements.
- Loopholes: Investigate gaps in laws or rules and how they can be exploited or closed.
- Line Drawing: Examine how courts, lawmakers, or individuals draw boundaries to resolve complex legal issues.
- Write a fifth question that ties together two or more of these concepts.
- Write one question for each of the following concepts:
- Draft and Explain the Correct Answer (and Incorrect Answers):
- For each question, provide an answer key.
- Explain in 3-5 sentences why your answer is correct.
- Explain why the other choices are incorrect.
- Cite Readings and Class Discussions:
- Use examples, principles, and authors we’ve studied in class to support your answers.
- Draw from readings like Kenneth Arrow on incentives, Saul Levmore on legal innovation, and Michael Pardo on proof.
Grading Criteria:
- 20 Points per Question (100 Points Total):
- Creativity & Practicality (10 points): Does your question reflect real-world complexity? Does it require thoughtful application rather than simple recall?
- Clarity (5 points): Is the question clear and well-written?
- Correct Answer Explanation (5 points): Does your explanation demonstrate depth and reference course materials?
Important Notes:
- Avoid simplistic or overly broad questions, such as “What is a loophole?” or “Define win-win transactions.” Questions like these will receive little to no credit.
- Be practical: Think of scenarios that a lawyer, judge, or policymaker might actually encounter.
- You’re welcome to reference hypothetical scenarios or current events to inspire your questions.
Example:
- You may wish to create a question about a company’s creative interpretation of tax laws (loopholes) or a scenario where facts are disputed in a courtroom. Be sure to focus on the legal reasoning process and the consequences of these situations.