WhatsApp Number: +1(249) 265-0080
Four Principles Ethical Analysis
This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data by means of the four boxes approach to analyze the case will help you apply the four principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice).
Based on the reading of the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and topic Resources, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document by including the following:
Part 1: Chart
This chart will formalize the application of the four boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.
Part 2: Evaluation
This part includes questions that evaluate how the four principles approach would be applied according to the Christian worldview.
Support your response using only Chapter 3 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care and the Topic 3 Resource “Rising to ‘The Highest Morals’ -The Rich History of Nursing Ethics.”
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance
Check our essay writing services here
Four Principles Ethical Analysis
To complete this assignment effectively, you will need to:
Part 1: Chart
Organize the case study information into the Four Boxes Framework:
Principle | Application to the Case |
---|---|
Autonomy | Identify the patient’s ability to make informed decisions. Consider their preferences, values, and whether they fully understand the options presented. |
Beneficence | Analyze the ways the clinician can act in the best interest of the patient, promoting well-being and advocating for treatments that improve their health outcomes. |
Nonmaleficence | Highlight actions aimed at avoiding harm, such as minimizing risks associated with treatment or avoiding unnecessary interventions. |
Justice | Explore the equitable allocation of resources, ensuring the patient’s treatment aligns with broader fairness principles in healthcare delivery. |
Part 2: Evaluation
Respond to the provided questions, focusing on how these principles align with the Christian worldview. Examples include:
- Christian Perspective on Autonomy: Balancing respect for the patient’s freedom of choice with moral guidance and informed decision-making rooted in Christian values.
- Christian Perspective on Beneficence and Nonmaleficence: Acting with compassion and love, as Christ taught, ensuring the care provided promotes healing and avoids harm.
- Justice and Fairness in a Christian Context: Ensuring equitable treatment while recognizing the inherent dignity of every person as…