Effective Altruism in Action

Effective Altruism in Action

Your writing assignment is on pp 107-108. The topic is Effective Altruism. Read the problem and answer the four questions writing in a narrative form (do not list the question numbers. Tie your paragraphs together with appropriate transitional language.)

750 words.

According to utilitarianism, are effective altruists doing the morally right thing? Why or Why not?

Do you think that you are morally obligated to give a significant portion of your income to charity? If so, how much do you think you should give?

Do you think that it is important to choose a career that will allow you to do the most good in the world?

Why or why not?

4. Are the actions of effective altruists like Julia and Jeff supererogatory? Why or why not?

Check our essay writing services here

APA

Effective Altruism in Action

Effective altruism, as a philosophy and practical movement, challenges us to reconsider our moral obligations by encouraging the maximization of good in the world. From a utilitarian perspective, the actions of effective altruists are seen as morally right because they seek to achieve the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism holds that the morality of an action is determined by its outcomes, and by prioritizing actions that alleviate suffering and promote well-being on a large scale, effective altruists align their conduct with these ethical principles. This approach compels individuals to evaluate their resources and efforts in terms of their overall impact. In this light, effective altruists like Julia and Jeff are motivated by the desire to maximize the positive consequences of their actions, ensuring that their contributions lead to tangible improvements in global health, education, and poverty reduction. Their commitment to data-driven charity and strategic giving is a direct application of utilitarian ethics, making their endeavors not only commendable but arguably morally necessary in a world of scarce resources and pressing global challenges.

Reflecting on my personal beliefs, I find that I too am increasingly convinced that I have a moral obligation to contribute a significant portion of my income to charity. The utilitarian argument, as articulated by philosophers like Peter Singer, suggests that if one can prevent harm and improve lives without sacrificing something of comparable moral value, then one is ethically compelled to do so. For me, this means that if my resources can be used to save lives or drastically improve the quality of life for others, I should not hesitate to allocate a meaningful share of my earnings toward such efforts. While determining the exact percentage remains a personal decision, I lean toward the view that a commitment of at least 10% of my income could be justified, if not more. This figure is reflective of both an aspirational standard and a realistic assessment of my ability to contribute without jeopardizing my own stability. I believe that such generosity not only helps those in need but also reinforces the values of compassion and…