ACA Preventive Services Lawsuit

ACA Preventive Services Lawsuit

NOTE: Cite at least 2 scholarly references published within the last 5 years.

Deliverable Length: 5-7 pgs not including the title, abstract, and reference pgs

Description

Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act, there have been several lawsuits in the federal courts, and some have made their way to the Supreme Court. Not all of these cases are accepted for appeal by the Supreme Court and thus are settled at the appellate court. Analyze a recent appellant court case related to a healthcare legal case. If possible, find a case in your own federal appellate court. Discuss your answers to the following questions:

In what court did this case originate? What is the law at issue in this case?
What are the arguments supporting the law, and what are the arguments to overturn the law?
Discuss the effect of this court case on healthcare delivery or operations. For example, will patient care be changed?
How will the operations of a healthcare organization or health insurance company be changed?

Check our essay writing services here

APA

ACA Preventive Services Lawsuit

Introduction

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, has faced numerous legal challenges, some reaching the appellate courts and the Supreme Court. A notable recent case is Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra, which addresses the ACA’s preventive services mandate. This analysis examines the case’s origin, the legal issues at stake, supporting and opposing arguments, and its potential impact on healthcare delivery and operations.

Case Origin and Legal Issues

Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra originated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The plaintiffs, including Braidwood Management, challenged the ACA’s mandate requiring health plans to cover preventive services without cost-sharing. They argued that this mandate violated their constitutional and religious rights, particularly objecting to coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) on religious grounds. The case was subsequently appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Arguments Supporting and Opposing the Law

Supporting the Law:

Public Health Benefits: The ACA’s preventive services mandate aims to improve public health by ensuring access to essential preventive measures, thereby reducing the…