Legal Consequences of Police Misconduct

Effective Team Dynamics

Effective Team Dynamics

Team Dynamics: (100 Points) – Document must be Microsoft Word ONLY

Contemplate a time when you were part of a team.  It can be a well-functioning, high performing team, or a total disaster.  Based on your reflections on that experience, answer the following (1-2 pages):

  1. Provide an overview of the context and description of the team.
  2. Was the team high or low functioning?  Explain.
  3. What was your particular role on the team?  How did you contribute to the team (both positively and negatively as applicable)?
  4. Comment on the extent to which the following elements were positive, negative or at times, both:
  • Leadership
  • Vision & Objectives
  • Skills
  • Cohesion
  • Resources
  • Incentives
  1. How will you personally drive higher performance in your next group project?

Additional notes for this assignment:

Write using a formal business style as if you were writing a closing report.

Submit your assignment using MSWord. Double space and use a reasonable font (there’s nothing wrong with 12 point Times New Roman!).

Each of the above five elements should be a separate paragraph. For element #4, do not just say “the leadership was good. The vision was good…” You need to explain and discuss why.

Effective Team Dynamics

Check our essay writing services here

APA

Effective Team Dynamics

Context and Team Description
During my last year at university, I participated in a team for a strategic management course project. The team comprised five students, and our goal was to analyze a real company’s business strategy, identify areas for improvement, and present a final report with our recommendations. Although each member had different skill sets and academic backgrounds, we all shared a general interest in management and consulting. The project spanned three months, requiring weekly meetings, individual research, and collaborative report writing. Effective Team Dynamics

Team Functionality
The team overall was high-functioning, although there were occasional issues related to communication and workload distribution. Most members were dedicated, proactive, and invested in the project’s success, which contributed to…