Human Research Protection

Human Research Protection

Review the Frequently Asked Questions on Requirements for Education at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) : https://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-education

Read the detailed document by the NIH:

https://grants.nih.gov/sites/default/files/PHRP_Archived_Course_Materials_English.pdf

Reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.

Discuss at least two of the following:

Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.
Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?
The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.
Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.

Your reflection should be two pages and written in current APA Style.

Check our essay writing services here

APA

Reflection on Protecting the Rights of Human Research Participants

The materials provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) emphasize the importance of protecting the rights and welfare of human research participants. These guidelines ensure that ethical principles are upheld in research, safeguarding individuals from potential harm and exploitation. Reflecting on these materials, I have gained valuable insights into the historical context, ethical principles, and regulatory frameworks surrounding human research protection.

Circumstances Influencing the Need for Policy

The necessity for robust policies to protect human research subjects emerged from a history of unethical research practices. Notable examples include the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where African American men were misled and denied effective treatment for syphilis, and the Nazi medical experiments during World War II, which subjected individuals to inhumane treatment. These events highlighted the potential for harm when researchers prioritize scientific advancement over human dignity and welfare.

Human research subjects can be harmed in various ways. For instance, physical harm can result from untested or unsafe interventions. Psychological harm can arise from insensitive questioning or exposure to distressing scenarios, while breaches of confidentiality can lead to social or professional repercussions for participants. Policies like the Common Rule and the creation of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) ensure that studies are reviewed and monitored to minimize such risks. Human Research Protection

Vulnerable Populations and Associated Restrictions

Three vulnerable populations include children, prisoners, and