WhatsApp Number: +1(249) 265-0080
Interpreting Gospel Parables
1. The Genre of Gospel and the Use of Parables in the Gospels:
a. According to IBI (chapter 10), “the concepts of thinking horizontally and vertically … summarize the task of interpreting the Gospels’ unique blend of history and theology” (514). In terms of the interpretation of the Gospels, contrast below horizontal and vertical thinking, according to IBI (see 514-18).
Which approach takes priority over the other, and why? How do the authors of IBI evaluate the use of redaction criticism in the interpretation of the Gospels? Compose 250-300 words
What is the significance of the concept of the kingdom of God for the
Gospels, according to the authors of IBI. Compose one paragraph (250-300 words):
c. According to the authors of IBI, “an appreciation of the parables as narrative fiction. … [Parables] encourage readers to identify with one or more of [the] characters and experience the plot of the story from their various points of view” (525); “readers should consider each parable from the perspective of each of the main characters” (526). State below two of the problems identified by the authors of IBI in the history of the interpretation of the parables (524-25) that preceded their recommendation of the interpretative guidelines above. Compose 250-300 word
Check our essay writing services here
Interpreting Gospel Parables
1. Horizontal and Vertical Thinking in Gospel Interpretation:
Horizontal and vertical thinking represent two approaches to interpreting the Gospels. According to IBI (chapter 10), horizontal thinking involves examining the Gospels primarily in their historical context, focusing on the events and facts presented in the texts. This method prioritizes the external, historical framework and the narrative as a reflection of real-world events. Vertical thinking, on the other hand, focuses on the theological meaning of the text, seeking to uncover the spiritual and doctrinal significance of the Gospel message. It addresses the deeper meanings behind the historical events described and interprets the text in relation to divine purposes.
The authors of IBI emphasize that both forms of thinking are necessary for a complete understanding of the Gospels, but they suggest that vertical thinking (theological interpretation) takes priority over horizontal thinking (historical analysis). This is because the Gospels are not merely historical accounts; they are theological narratives with the purpose of conveying the message of salvation and…